Is the Royal Mail strike bad for the environment?

The postal strike is having an impact on EthicalSuperstore.com but I worry that the real loser in this will be the environment. We’ve had to suspend our cheapest delivery rate, but generally most parcels are being delivered by our friends at Parcel Force. However, the long term implications of a weakened Royal Mail are definitely bad for the environment.

Our postie—she’s actually a young woman—drops our letters and small packets off every day at home around 9am. She walks from the delivery depot with a small sack of letters and then collects the rest of her letters from strategically located pick up points round her route. It works because all letters in the UK outside of London are still delivered by the Royal Mail. She passes every house every day.

Now imagine a world where Royal Mail is weakened to the point where they no longer deliver to every house every day. Either we’ll all be driving to the sorting office to pick our mail up – 500 houses on our postie’s route might mean 500 more journeys each day by car!!!! Alternatively, lots of new van or car based delivery schemes get launched and we all get multiple deliveries each week from multiple companies. May be slightly less impact than us all driving places but ultimately much worse than the system we have now.

Postal delivery is an environmental issue. The government—the current owner of the Royal Mail—needs to focus less on preparing to sell it and more on building the service it has to be truly world class. We have cost effective, environmentally sensitive delivery to every home in the UK – do we really want to squander it?

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. BeDeepGreen says:

    Nice idea. I’ve always felt that some things are for the common good and therefore should have some degree of state support or control. The Royal Mail universal delivery seems like a common good for all that is worth subsidising.

    BeDeepGreen

  2. Vic says:

    The strike appears to be ending. Let’s all hope that quality improves as a result of the new agreement.

  3. Jolly Green Giant says:

    Surely another way to avoid damaging an already fragile ecosphere is for organisations like yourselves to stop sending out unsolicted mailings to people who are not interested in them.

    I’m sure we could save Sherwood Forest every month

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *